Massachusetts Anti-Casino Ballot Question Gets Nixed by State AG
A citizens’ anti-gambling effort has been shot down by the State’s Attorney General
While the continuing state of Massachusetts is gearing up for rapid expansion of gambling in the state, not everyone has been excited about the move. That’s why some anti-gambling activists there have created a petition in order to force a vote that is statewide set up casino projects would be able to go forward.
Those that are against the new casinos were able to gather sufficient signatures to send the ballot question forward to the attorney general’s office. But regrettably for them, the state solicitor but a stop to your move, saying that the ballot question would not be legal underneath the state’s ballot initiative process.
Constitutional Provisions Preclude Ballot Question
Beneath the current state Constitution, the ballot initiative process is covered by Article 48. That article not just outlines the process for getting concern on the ballot, but also establishes what can and can’t be included in such questions. One of the principles for proposals says that they cannot hinder an entity’s ’right to receive settlement for personal property appropriated to public use’.
Based on state solicitor Peter Sacks, in the event that relevant concern were to be authorized by the public, thus ending the casino deals immediately, it might simply take the casino developers’ contract rights away without any compensation. It would also ’impair the contracts that are implied between the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and those designers, who have previously paid millions in application fees to your state.Fortsätt läsa